Old French Flow Map Depicts Napoleon’s Fight against Russia’s Geography

A 19th-century print showing cold and hungry French soldiers during the retreat from Moscow

You have seen many maps, graphs, and charts that display geographical and historical information. But did you know that a flow map drawn in 1869 has been described as “the best statistical graphic ever drawn”? More on that shortly, but first . . .

This winter marks the 200th anniversary of one of the worst military disasters of all time. In 1812, Napoleon Bonaparte sought to add Russia to his already huge European empire. He thought that the Russian emperor, Alexander I, would surely surrender when confronted with the obvious might of Napoleon’s great army. But Alexander knew he had a powerful ally—Russia’s physical geography.

On June 24, 1812, Napoleon entered Russian territory with perhaps half a million soldiers. Soon heavy rain made the already bad roads impassable. Supply wagons couldn’t keep up with the army, and both men and horses went hungry. When the French army encountered Russian forces, the Russians would fight but then retreat—time and time again—into the vast Russian countryside. Finally, Napoleon arrived in Moscow. To deny Napoleon a real victory, the Muscovites abandoned the city. Fires broke out, and most of Moscow burned to the ground. If Napoleon had sent the army back to France immediately, further disaster might have been averted. However, he waited until October 18, when the temperature was already dropping below freezing. When they finally turned toward home, a journey of more than 600 miles lay ahead of the dejected soldiers. Bitter cold, starvation, and hostile Russian peasants took a heavy toll. In the end, only about 10,000 soldiers made it back to France.

Now back to that map: It was drawn by French engineer Charles Minard and shows clearly how weather and distance crippled Napoleon’s invasion. (See the original in the first Related Link, below.) The graphic shows how the army was reduced in size to a trickle, along with information on the towns, rivers, dates, and temperatures during the retreat. Minard’s map is unequaled in its ability to display, in the starkest terms, a story of defeat, misery, and death.

Image credit: © Bettmann/Corbis

Related Links

  • Charles Joseph Minard
    Click on the image titled “Charles Minard’s flow map of Napoleon’s March” to enlarge the graphic.
    (Source: Wikipedia; accessed November 30, 2012)
  • Re-visions of Minard
    Minard’s map has received lots of attention from modern graphic designers. See how several have re-imagined his work. The site includes a complete English translation of the text on Minard’s graphic.
    (Source: York University; accessed November 30, 2012)
  • Napoleon’s Invasion of Russia
    This very large website includes illustrations, facts and figures, and battle maps, as well as an extensive description of the invasion.
    (Source: private website; accessed November 30, 2012)
  • War and Peace, by Leo Tolstoy
    You can find the entire text of Tolstoy’s masterful novel about the invasion and the subsequent retreat here.
    (Source: Gutenberg.org; accessed November 30, 2012)

2 Comments

  1. Florin says:

    Whilst I find myself oanciosally irritated by Tufte’s dogmatic approach Minard’s graphic really is great. As has been mentioned it’s was groundbreaking at the time, there’s many layers of data available and it rewards close study with greater understanding of the subject it illustrates. true it’s not immediately obvious what’s going on, but then it wasn’t produced for the front page of USA Today, graphics don’t all have to be designed for the same audience. As for the question of whether it’s the best ? I don’t know it depends what you’re talking about. It’s almost certainly the best infographic showing Napoleons campaign against Russia. Further I think the idea that graphics can only say one thing is really restrictive, that rules out almost all visualisation that’s used for exploring data sets rather than making a point, sometimes you visualise data to find out what its interesting features are rather than the other way around. The idea that all graphics should be for the same thing. i.e. instantly making a point, is a great way to cut off huge swathes of infographic potential and if you stick to it you’ll potentially dismiss great ideas and new solutions like Minard’s before they even get onto the drawing board.

  2. M&M or little slim says:

    yo